The Virus Crisis: An Introduction
There is a lot of money invested in maintaining the virus story. Rather than a reformation, I believe medical science needs a restoration—a bringing back of the true spirit of science.
Unprecedented Times
I’m not sure that I can tell you when the COVID-19 crisis ended, or how many supposed variants were declared.
Of course, we all remember when it started. It’s hard to believe that just a few years ago, this was our normal:
Businesses and churches closed their doors. People isolated themselves. You couldn’t go in groups to visit a sick loved one in the hospital. You were lucky if they let one person in. We learned to communicate through plastic and fabric barriers or via Zoom. We obediently stood in line on those circles marked 6’ (2 m) apart. Everyday life for some of us looked a little like Adrian Monk's.
It was to save lives, we were told. It was the compassionate thing to do—to isolate. Even if you weren’t sick, you could unknowingly be carrying a deadly virus that could infect someone else.
We all remember the push from mainstream media:
Some might not have questioned this. I didn’t consciously.
But there was no evidence to show that any of these measures were effective. In fact, to the contrary, doctors began to notice they had a negative effect on people.
Lockdowns and isolation caused increased cases of anxiety, depression, addiction, PTSD, domestic abuse, self-harm, and suicide—the long-term effects of which are still being seen. Not to mention the harm caused by the “vaccines” themselves—strange blood clots, signs of reproductive harm, and long-term effects that are still being discovered.
You can read my prior posts, Poisoned by Degrees & What’s in the Vial for my personal example of vaccine-related harm.
Medical professionals who did speak out were cancelled, intimidated, and labeled conspiracy theorists. I wish I had the space in this post to tell the stories of some of these doctors, but I’ll provide a snapshot below, including links, where you can look for yourself.
“…How many deaths is difficult to calculate as ‘covid deaths’ have often been defined as ‘a death with a positive PCR Test’ rather than as a result of the recognised disease process and illness caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus.
“However, we all know that multiple co-morbidities are involved 94% of the time […]. Thus it is more than likely the 3.8 million deaths are an overestimate. Overwhelmingly these deaths have been in the frail elderly and others with serious pre-existing illness, […] often in populations where the average age of death with/from covid exceeds that of the average life expectancy. That said, estimates of the infectious fatality rate (IFR) cluster around 0.15-0.2% overall, which is similar to the IFR of influenza, and 0.05% for those <70 years. The risk to children is very low, less than for influenza, and the risk to adolescents and young adults is 4 orders of magnitude lower than the elderly and so do not justify any restrictions applied across the population. We endorse the recommendations embodied in the Great Barrington Declaration.”
Covid Medical Network (later renamed the Australian Medical Network) Open Letter to All Doctors and All Australians, August 9, 2021, emphasis added
“I acknowledge that on 9th March, 2021, AHPRA issued the COVID 19 Vaccination Position Statement (‘Gag Orders’) which relevantly states:
“‘.. any promotion of anti-vaccination statements or health advice which contradicts the best available scientific evidence or, seeks to actively undermine the National Immunisation Campaign (including via social media) is not supported by the National Boards and may be in breach of the codes of conduct and subject to investigation and possible regulatory action.’
“I believe this statement contradicts that which I signed up for as a practitioner because:
“1) It denies freedom of speech
“2) It denies informed consent –and–
“3) It is indisputably highly coercive.
“With regards to freedom of speech, my understanding is that this a fundamental unalienable right, as per international law (Law of Nations), which overrides any state and federal laws. […]
“As a practitioner, I cannot ethically operate in an environment that promotes non-evidence-based government health policy above fundamental democratic freedoms and unalienable human rights. Similarly, I cannot ethically work in a system beholden to boards and bureaucracies that must either be ignorant of the existence of opposing information (indicative of incompetence) or complicit in suppressing that information (or possibly some combination of both).”
Dr. Ros Nealon-Cook, letter to Australian authorities, July 27, 2022, emphasis added
Websites and Interviews:
Dr. Sam White on the Medical Mafia (~60 min) - A UK doctor spoke out on social media, endured legal intimidation, and renounced his license. He now works to help those injured by the vaccine.
COVID Psychological Manipulation: Unpacked (~90 min) - A former psychologist discusses how media manipulation was used during the COVID crisis to override the rational mind.
The Cape Byron Lighthouse Declaration - Medical professionals & concerned citizens are encouraged to sign this declaration in support of the following requests to the governments of the world:
Silencing & censorship must stop - free speech is a right
Patients have the right to informed consent (knowing risks & benefits) before starting a treatment
Mask mandates & lockdowns must cease
There needs to be more transparency in science & medicine
For the moment, mask mandates and lockdowns have ended. However, the COVID crisis set a precedent.
Please consider that many of these doctors are putting their medical professions at risk (those who haven’t already lost or renounced their licenses). Yet, integrity-driven, critical-thinking, observant individuals are the kind of people who make the best kind of doctors—those who want to help patients get well and not see them manage symptoms indefinitely.
Why Speak About COVID-19 in 2024?
This post and others I plan to write soon have been a long time coming.
In April, I was listening to the Human Freedom Project podcast, when I heard this statement that riveted my attention.
“Nobody has ever found any virus—any particle you could call a virus—in any material from any sick animal or person or plant.”
This statement comes from Dr. Tom Cowan, M.D. Like other doctors who spoke out about lockdowns, mask mandates, and the unethical push to take the unproven COVID-19 vaccine, Dr. Cowan was pressured out of his job and heavily censored during the course of the pandemic.
However, Dr. Cowan’s message is more than just a protest against the way the COVID crisis was handled.
His claim, which I have been investigating for myself, is that viruses have not been proven to exist. At all. Not just SARS-CoV-2.
You may ask, if there was no virus then what were people getting sick from? Because there is no denying that people were getting sick.
There are actually several possible answers to this question:
COVID-19 is a rebranding of typical seasonal respiratory illnesses, none of which are proven to be caused by viruses either, but rather are the body’s natural detoxification process (compare symptoms for yourself in this Mayo Clinic article).
The nocebo effect—which is opposite of placebo (i.e. that if you believe you are going to get sick, you will get sick).
Sensitivity or complications related to airborne pollution.
None of these has to do with a pathogen or microbe.
But—you’ll say—what about the things the scientists and authorities have been telling us? There’s a story about the virus transmitting from a bat in China. Or the “leaked” story that the virus was created in a Chinese lab.
There is so much to unpack that it’s beyond the scope of just one post. That’s not to say I won't return to these questions. To start, as we saw with the COVID-19 propaganda, a lot of the information we receive is being controlled by vested interests—including and especially the pharmaceutical industry.
Reuters has a board member who also sits on a pharmaceutical board.
FactCheck.org is funded by an organization that has $1.8 billion stock in vaccine companies.
The Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation has invested massively in both the pharmaceutical industry, in world and government health organizations, and in COVID-19 vaccines in particular.
There’s a lot of money invested in maintaining the virus story. Whether the story is bats or biological warfare, it’s all meaningless “hand waving” if there is no virus. It’s a common magician’s trick to use distraction to keep the audience from looking too closely at what’s really going on.
Since I was little, I was taught that viruses were real. I’m sure you were, too. There was no reason for us to look at the science. At this point, we’re talking about 100-150 years of science based on the germ theory of disease.
But we keep pouring money into the system, and no one is getting healthier. We keep finding more diseases. We’re getting sicker at a younger age, too.
It’s time to look at why.
We live in an age when we feel our governments and laws generally protect us from massive fraud and deceit. However, as we see throughout history, those with the power and the money control the narrative. There have been terrible regimes throughout the ages that lied to people in order to keep them compliant so they could push an agenda forward. There still are today.
That is not to say that every doctor and every scientist and every government leader is in on a conspiracy. To the contrary, I think many if not most people have no idea what is going on.
Why?
Medical science is steeped in tradition and plagued with tunnel-vision. A lot of virology is complicated, technical work. And it's segmented into a lot of parts with different specialists handling each part. Those scientists who are open-minded and curious, who question the procedures (as they should), can also jeopardize their livelihood. We’ve seen what happened to doctors who questioned the narrative during COVID.
Don't forget—who is a major contributor to scientific research? Who influences what is being taught in medical school? Who reviewed standards of quality of the COVID-19 vaccine, issued under emergency orders?
Pharmaceutical companies, a.k,a. “Big Pharma.” Those who have a stake in the narrative.
Whether or not there is a virus, the level of control that is being exercised by the few is unethical.
But—
There is no proof by the standards of science (i.e. the scientific method) that viruses exist. And if there really is no virus, then what are we doing giving children as many as 70 vaccines by the age of 18?
When I started this blog, I didn’t think I would be writing this post. I only had the intention of sharing my own personal story in the hopes of helping other people not feel so alone. Except now I know the alleged pandemic, virus, and vaccine are part of my story. And I can’t live with being silent.
Like the doctors I mentioned above, I can’t sit by when I know that possible future harm awaits those who continue to support this flawed system.
Whether there is a virus or not matters less to me than integrity:
Science needs to operate based on the scientific method.
Pharmaceutical companies should not have a large stake in the system that supports them.
We should investigate to determine the true underlying cause of disease rather than following a protocol that treats only symptoms.
Keeping silent does not solve these problems.
Will you walk with me through my journey of my last six months of studying and we’ll see together what exists to prove or disprove the virus model, germ theory, and contagion?
I believe this is an incredibly relevant question, as the news media continues to push the message (handed down from above): “get vaccinated, beware of ‘Disease X,’ and WE have all the facts.”
A Brief Introduction to Virology
I can’t cover in length today all that I want to cover. There will be more posts to follow. Here is the basic premise.
Virology’s claim is that a piece of genetic code (RNA or DNA) wrapped in a protein coat can infiltrate the cells of our bodies and hijack them in order to self-replicate. These non-living, self-replicating pieces of genetic material cause various adverse affects in our bodes.
However, these particles are nano-scale and can’t be seen with the traditional light microscope. They were only assumed by germ theorists to exist until the invention of the electron microscope in the 1930s when scientists allegedly saw them for the first time.
Many attempts have been made to purify viruses (i e. separate them from other particles in order to prove they alone are the cause of disease), but supposedly this cannot be done without growing a large enough sample in a petri dish. Once the viral culture produces the expected cytopathic effects (CPE, a.k.a. cell death), a sample of the unfiltered broth is then taken and analyzed. A virus genome is constructed via computer using the fragments of proteins & RNA/DNA found in the broth.
The biggest problem with this is all the assumptions made along the way. It’s not science to assume there is a virus and then find ways to prove it exists. Not to mention assembling a virus genome from fragments of genetic material in a broth rather than just trying to find a whole virus to begin with.
A group of dissident doctors has issued a challenge to scientists to prove the existence of SARS-CoV-2 via the scientific method. Or, at least to meet them halfway on the standards.
You can watch an overview of the challenge here. The original video (at the top) is ~20 minutes. There is also an excellent 60 minute follow-up video that gets a little more technical.
Upcoming Posts
There is much more to cover on this subject:
The predecessor and alternative theory to the germ theory
Koch’s postulates: a set of logical conditions on which the germ theory of disease is based
Are vaccines actually safe & effective? And what is in them?
Why are “controls” (a key element of the scientific method) missing in virology?
Why is the virology term “isolation” the exact opposite of the dictionary definition of “isolation”?
A look at the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test and rapid antigen test (RAT) that were used to “diagnose” cases of COVID-19
Is contagion real?
And more
Whenever I think about the disconnect between the layman and the scientist, I can’t help but think of the Protestant Reformation. Martin Luther, William Tyndale, and other leaders sought to make Bible and its teachings accessible to the people during a time when religious knowledge was strictly controlled by the Catholic church. Rather than being a guide or a vehicle, the church stood between people and God. Many prominent reformationists died or renounced their positions in the church in an attempt to create needed change. Of course, now there are thousands of Christian churches, all with varying beliefs despite being based on the Bible.
Rather than a reformation, I believe medical science needs a restoration—a bringing back of the true spirit of science: curiosity, exploration, courage, collaboration, transparency, and acceptance of fallibility. Truth-seeking, rather than authority-seeking.
It’s one thing to be a guide—to communicate and problem-solve disease with a patient. It’s another thing to diminish “healthcare” to scientific hand-waving and a mounting regimen of prescriptions, both of which people are expected to swallow without question.
Although I believe that science does not support the existence of a virus, as defined by medical authorities, there are things that do spread communicably and are just as potent: fear, hate, misunderstanding, and judgment, to name a few. This was the real pandemic we witnessed.
But on the other side there is hope, love, generosity, and kindness. These things spread, too. But it takes effort for that to start. This time of year—the upcoming Christmas season—is my favorite time of year for that reason. It's just a little bit easier for goodness to flourish because we try a little harder.
My hope is that these next several posts will provide some relief from fear of disease. Fear is antithetical to healing.
Pain and disease are not things to fear. Only understanding and truth can bring about the healing we seek.
With love,
Ordinary Girl
Detox Update
I’ve stepped off the chelation regimen. I did three weeks of detox, one week of rest, then about two weeks more of detox before I stopped. Perhaps I should say I have scaled way back because I have felt my body request a dose once or twice since then.
EDTA is a powerful chemical. By the end of the first three weeks I was getting some signals that the rest period was very much needed. After the first week of round two I felt like I needed to step up the mineral supplement to compensate. I was experiencing some physical stress and odd heart palpitations (which did exist before the chelation, but felt more pronounced).
I did switch multivitamins at the start of round 2, so it may be that my balance was different, too.
I may not need any more detox for now, which is great. Or it’s possible that my body needs time to catch up before the chelation can be effective deeper in the frozen areas of my body. My blood flow is not great and has been getting worse over the last two years. In fact, I'm worried about how many of my blood cells may have been damaged by the vaccine constituents. Luckily blood cells replenish fairly quickly.
So, I'm not taking EDTA on a regular basis anymore. However, I am continuing the Vitamin C. About 1000 mg in the morning along with my collagen. It’s an antioxidant, it’s a mood booster, and my body is really needing both of those things. Even after a hard day of work, my mood has improved so much that I don’t need to be a total recluse to recover.
Like I said before, I don’t want to be on any supplement or treatment long-term. Just as the toxicity came on by degrees, I think taking it down by degrees is a solid plan. I’m continuing to regain proprioception and willful use of muscles in areas that have been frozen for a long time, even without the chelation.
“Slow and steady wins the race” is the story of my life. But it’s working!
That’s a lot of information! Thanks Lisa.